Canon PowerShot SX20 IS Review

[Jim Keenan]

Not quite a year after announcing the Powershot SX10 IS ultrazoom, Canon is back with a successor, the PowerShot SX20 IS. The new camera gets a higher 12.1 megapixel resolution on the same physical-sized sensor, a 720p HD video capability and an HDMI connection to facilitate playback of images on an HDTV.

Folks familiar with the SX10 IS will note the new camera appears to be virtually identical to the old (the main external difference seems to be the enlargement of the digital cover on the camera's right side to include the HDMI port), and the similarity is more than skin deep. The 20x zoom lens ranging from 28 to 560mm (35mm equivalent) has been retained, along with the 2.5 inch articulating monitor and full auto and manual shooting modes. Here's a look at that lens range:

Wide Angle

Telephoto

The SX20 carries a Digic IV processor (as does the SX10), but the mention of "improved smart auto" in Canon's ad copy suggests the later model processor may give the camera some additional capability. While the SX20 IS has been described by Canon as the successor to the SX10 IS, that camera remains on the Canon website at present.

The SX20 IS accepts SD/SDHC, MultiMediaCards, MMC plus and HC MMC plus memory media. Canon includes 4 AA alkaline batteries, a neck strap, lens hood, lens cap, USB and AV cables and CD-ROM software with each camera.
What they don't include is the comprehensive user's manual - you get the basic "getting started" portion of the full manual (the first 40 pages out of 180), but you'll have to download and print the complete guide on your own.

Those missing pages cover everything from a detailed explanation of camera controls and settings to manual shooting modes to the playback/retouch menus to... well, to basically all the stuff that anyone who plans on moving the mode dial (page 42 of the full manual) off of "auto" may want to know at one time or another.

OK, Canon's gotten off on the wrong foot by going the easy route (for them) on the in-box user's manual - let's see if SX20 IS performance can save the day.

---

BUILD AND DESIGN
Following the typical formula for the class, the SX20 IS looks and feels like a downsized DSLR, measuring out at 4.88x3.48x3.42 inches and weighing about 24 ounces in shooting configuration (batteries, memory card and lens hood installed). If these numbers look familiar, they happen to be the exact dimensions and weight of the SX10 IS.

The body is composite and the materials and overall build quality appear to be on a par with the class competition. A bit of play in the lens (both wide angle and zoomed out to telephoto) that appeared in some competitors (but without degrading image quality) is missing from the SX20 IS - the camera has a solid feel.

Ergonomics and Controls
With identical dimensions, weight and control layout, you might suspect the SX20 IS handles much like the SX10 IS in this arena, and you'd be right. What I wrote about the SX10 is equally applicable to the SX20:

The SX20 IS features a deeply sculptured handgrip style body and contoured back that is small enough so the little finger of my right hand has no place to go but curl under the body, resulting in a firm and solid one-handed grip. The index finger falls quite naturally to the shutter button in both one and two handed shooting. There is rubberized material at the front of the handgrip portion of the body, but it's as smooth as the plastics that make up the rest of camera exterior and really contributes little to improving the grip. The same holds true for a patch of nubs molded in the plastic on the camera back in the thumb rest area - I'd prefer a really tacky material in these two locations, but the camera has an overall good feel in the hand(s).

External buttons and controls allow access to most shooting modes as well as many other settings that the user might want to change on the run, such as white balance, ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation and continuous shooting modes. The portion of the camera back not taken up by the monitor is awash with buttons, but Canon has laid them out so as to minimize conflict with the thumb when shooting.

Menus and Modes
If you've been around Canon compacts before then the menu layout will be an old friend - and if you're new to Canon you'll find the menus are largely intuitive. The camera can display a brief explanation of menu items as you select them if the "hints & tips" feature is enabled in the setup menu. Once you have images captured and are in playback mode, playback and print menus allow for a good range of in-camera image modifications and printing images directly from the camera via a PictBridge compliant printer.

In the past Canon has divided shooting modes into "image zone" and "creative zone" categories, but those terms have been dropped from the SX20 IS vocabulary. Now the only mention is of "shooting modes," a welcome simplification.

There are 13 primary shooting modes in the SX20 IS, exactly the same as the SX10 IS with the exception of the 720p HD video option of the newer camera:

• Auto
• Portrait
• Landscape
• Night snapshot
• Sports
• Special Scene: with a sub-menu including night scene, sunset, snow, fireworks, ISO 3200, color swap, indoor, foliage, beach, aquarium and color accent options
• Stitch Assist
• Movie: can capture video at 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 or 320 x 240 resolutions, all at 30 fps. Maximum recording times are 29 minutes, 59 seconds for HD, 1 hour for 640 or 320 or 4GB for any recording, whichever comes first.

The above modes are largely automatic and user inputs are typically limited to image size and quality settings, and single versus continuous shooting modes for still images.

• Program AE (P): camera sets aperture and shutter speed, user can select settings such as ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation and white balance
• Shutter Priority (Tv): user sets shutter speed, camera sets aperture and user can select from range of other settings
• Aperture Priority (Av): user sets aperture, camera sets shutter speed and user can select from range of other settings
• Manual (M): user sets aperture and shutter speeds, and can select from range of other settings
• Custom (C): can be used to save frequently used shooting modes (P, Av, Tv and M only) and various shooting settings, such as zoom or manual focus locations, menu settings, etc.

Display/Viewfinder
The 2.5 inch LCD monitor is of 230,000 dot composition, adjustable for 5 levels of brightness and can swing through 180 degrees of motion from the camera back while rotating through 270 degrees along its long axis. With many competitors going to 2.7 inch and larger monitors Canon is probably going to have to play catch-up before too much longer, but I found this monitor to be a bit more usable than most smaller monitors in bright outdoor light. Monitor coverage is 100%.

The 0.44 inch electronic viewfinder has 235,000 dot composition, and is also adjustable for five levels of brightness. The viewfinder is equipped with a diopter to compensate for eyesight acuity, and coverage is 100%.

PERFORMANCE
If I were limited to carrying only a compact digital camera, I'd pick an ultrazoom every time. You aren't going to drop one in a shirt pocket, but being able to call up a lens focal range from wide angle to serious telephoto out of a single relatively small and light unit is just too much versatility to ignore.

Shooting Performance
The SX20 IS displayed a focus icon about 1.5 seconds after power up, and I could get off a first shot in about 2.5 seconds. Single shot-to-shot times (shoot, write, re-acquire focus and shoot) times were about 2.5 seconds with a SanDisk ExtremeIII 20MB/s card.

Shutter Lag (press-to-capture, pre-focused)

Camera	Time (seconds)
Casio Exilim EX-FH20	0.02
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS	0.02
Nikon Coolpix P90	0.03
Olympus SP-590 UZ	0.03

AF Acquisition (press-to-capture, no pre-focus)

Camera	Time (seconds)
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS	0.40
Nikon Coolpix P90	0.56
Olympus SP-590 UZ	0.57
Casio Exilim EX-FH20	0.59

Continuous Shooting

Camera	Framerate*
Casio Exilim EX-FH20	30 fps†
Nikon Coolpix P90	1.4 fps
Olympus SP-590 UZ	1.2 fps
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS	1.1 fps

* Note: Continuous shooting framerates are based on the camera's fastest full-resolution JPEG continuous shooting mode, using the fastest media type available (300x CF, SDHC, etc.). "Frames" notes the number of captures recorded per burst before the camera stops/slows to clear the buffer.

† Note: The Casio Exilim FH20 has no continuous shooting capabilities at full resolution (9 megapixels). It is, however, capable of shooting at 30 fps at a slightly reduced 8 megapixels. Given this relatively high resolution, we have included the FH20's continuous shooting numbers in our comparison.

AF acquisition times were very good at wide angle and predictably slowed at telephoto, but the SX20 IS press-to-capture time of 0.40 seconds is one of the better results we've seen in a compact digital. Shutter lag leaves nothing to be desired (for a compact) at 0.02 seconds.

Continuous shooting rates at full resolution worked out to 1.1 fps and I quit counting when the SX20 IS reached 20 shots with no sign of slowing. While the camera wants to shoot all day in the continuous mode, there's a blackout of the screen for the first couple of shots in any sequence and once shots begin to display they lag one shot behind - trying to pan on a moving subject can become an exercise in guessing where to point the camera next, especially if you're filling the frame with the subject.

The flash range on the SX20 IS has increased over the SX10 IS (22 ft at wide angle - 12 at telephoto versus 17 ft and 9.2 ft, respectively) and recycle time is "7 seconds or less" versus "12 seconds or less" for the older camera. Canon's figures are based on auto ISO, but shooting in programmed auto at 80 ISO and normally lit conditions, the flash was ready to go again in 4.5 seconds at wide angle and 6.3 seconds at telephoto. I set up a worst case scenario and shot aperture priority at f/8, full telephoto and outside on a moonless night to encourage a full discharge - recycle time was a bit over 11 seconds. While the flash is recharging you'll get a flashing lightning bolt on the screen if you half push to try and focus for another shot (the camera will not allow you to shoot with the flash enabled and recharging), but as soon as the recharge is complete you'll get the focus icon if you're still holding the half push. Here's the flash serving as primary illumination for Simon and as fill for Bandit.

Canon rates battery life (CIPA standard) at 340 shots for alkalines and approximately 600 for NiMH, making the choice of power supply a simple decision.

Lens Performance
Canon's 20x zoom lens has a maximum aperture ranging from f/2.8 at wide angle to f/5.7 at telephoto - the wide end is as fast as the competition but the SX20 IS lags in aperture on the long end, where the other brands max out at f/4.5 or faster. That might be the low point for this lens - with identical ISO sensitivities the SX20 IS wide open can't match the faster shutter speeds the competition can generate at full telephoto. Faster is better for stopping action and helping keep images free from camera shake.

There is some barrel distortion present at wide angle along with some softness in the corners and a bit less on the edges of the frame - telephoto looks to be pretty clear of pincushion distortion and has less softness in the corners and edges. There can be chromic aberration (purple fringing) in some high contrast boundary areas, but enlargements in the 200 to 300% range are typically needed to call attention to this defect - the SX20 IS seems to handle this problem quite well.

The lens can focus from 0 to 3.9 inches in super macro mode, and 3.9 inches to 1.6 feet in macro mode (both at wide angle). Perhaps more interesting is the close focus distance at telephoto - 3.3 feet. That much lens that close can give you shots with an almost macro look to them, such as the cactus flowers that follow. I don't know about you, but macro and bees aren't in my vocabulary, so I was more than content to stand off a bit and shoot the flowers at 560mm. The original shots were then cropped to 12x8 inches, producing 287dpi and 248dpi files respectively that will still print nicely.

Original	Cropped
Original	Cropped

The SX20 IS features "optical" image stabilization which has traditionally meant the movement of lens elements as a means to combat camera shake. Canon's press release also mentions the inclusion of "Motion Detection Technology" which on other Canon compacts has meant a function that included the automatic ramping up of ISO sensitivity. There's no mention of MDT in any of the user manuals (the short or long versions), but shooting options that allow you to establish the ISO (P or the manual modes) would ordinarily be the best way to try and avoid having the camera resort to MDT.

Video Quality
The SX20 IS had one of the better quality 720p HD videos I've come across in a compact, and the zoom function of the lens is available. The ability of the camera to switch to video from whatever shooting mode you're in by merely pushing the movie button is a nice feature, and while recording you can always use the shutter button to take a still picture - the camera will take the shot and then continue video capture with the still image capture process incorporated as part of the video.

Image Quality
Default images from the SX20 IS were color accurate and pleasing as to sharpness. Canon's "my colors" palette is available for manual shooting modes and offers 10 color and monochrome shooting options in addition to the default setting of "off." Here are the off, vivid, neutral and positive film color options:

Off	Vivid
Neutral	Positive Film

If you're still not happy with the images out of the camera, the eleventh option of the my colors palette, "custom color," permits adjustment of contrast, sharpness, saturation, red, green, blue and skin tones over a range of 5 settings (default is #3 for each). Here's a shot at the default values and a second with the contrast, saturation and sharpness all set to maximum values.

Default

Maximum sharpness, contrast and saturation

Canon's i-contrast feature may be enabled to expand the apparent dynamic range of the camera by bringing out additional detail in darker portions of images while preserving highlights in the lighter portions. It is also available in the playback menu for post processing of images. Here's a shot with and without i-c.

i-contrast off

i-contrast auto

Auto white balance did a good job outdoors ranging from cloudy to bright, as well as with flash and fluorescent light sources, but shot quite warm with incandescent. There are daylight, cloudy, tungsten (incandescent), fluorescent white and fluorescent H, flash and custom white balance settings available.

Auto White Balance, 3200K incandescent light

I stayed with the default evaluative metering method for all the shots in this review, but there are center-weighted and spot options available. Evaluative could lose some highlights on occasion in high contrast situations, but overall gave me no reason to switch to the other methods.

ISO noise performance is typical for the class and comparable with that of the major competitors - the 80 and 100 ISO crop shots look pretty indistinguishable from one another and 200 is very similar, with a bit of noise creeping in.

ISO 80	ISO 80, 100% crop
ISO 100	ISO 100, 100% crop
ISO 200	ISO 200, 100% crop
ISO 400	ISO 400, 100% crop
ISO 800	ISO 800, 100% crop
ISO 1600	ISO 1600, 100% crop

Noise is becoming more prominent at 400, with 800 and 1600 predictably showing increasing effects. All the shots look pretty good at the small full-frame sizes - again, typical.

Additional Sample Images

CONCLUSIONS
When Canon introduced the SX10 IS, its 20x zoom closed that gap on the competition at the time. Since then the ultrazoom lens envelope has been pushed out to 24 and 26x (and 624 and 676mm, respectively), while Canon's just introduced successor to the SX10 IS stands pat at 20x and 560mm. While the lens numbers may not have changed, the SX20 IS has elevated Canon's game over the SX10 IS in a number of ways. It's not a sweeping remake of the brand's CCD sensor flagship but rather incremental improvements to an already capable platform.

AF acquisition time is faster, shutter lag is shorter. Flash range is increased and recycle times are lower. Macro focus range is closer. ISO noise performance is almost too close to call versus the SX10 IS, but the SX20 IS has an additional 2 megapixels on the sensor, so that's a net gain (and performance compares favorably with the competition). The 720p HD video quality is one of the better ones I've come across in compact digitals, and you can zoom while shooting. The SX10 IS was/is a good camera - this one's better.

The lens is slower than the competition at full telephoto by about 2/3 of a stop and the 2.5 inch monitor looks a bit dated in a world of 2.7 inches and up, but its range of motion compensates for size a bit. This camera won't shoot as wide or as long as some of the competition, but it can hold its own in the image quality department and that makes it a viable contender in this crowded class. Now if they'd only put the whole manual in the box...

Pros:

• Good image and color quality
• Good HD video quality
• Good shutter lag and AF acquisition times
• Good range of user-established settings for manual shooting modes

Cons:

• Lens is slower than competition at telephoto
• Monitor smaller than competition
• Provided user's manual useless for anything beyond full auto shooting

Related Articles:

• Head to Head: Canon PowerShot SX10 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50
• Canon PowerShot SX10 IS Review
• Canon refreshes point and shoot lineup with PowerShot G11 and more

[Andy Stanton]

I think the weight of the SX20, like the SX10, is an overall negative. It's by far the heaviest of the ultrazooms in its class. I would have bought the SX10, rather than my FZ28, if the Canon had weighed 150 grams less.

[Jim Keenan]

Good point - those 150 grams are about 5.3 ounces and that could certainly be seen as a negative.

I guess the fact that my usual sidekick is a D3 with a 24-70 has largely taken weight out of the equation in looking at ultrazooms - any of them are feather-weight by comparison. Weight would be well down on my list of considerations for camera selection, certainly when it amounted to a quarter pounder (with cheese). All else being equal, I'd put weight into play.

[Don]

Another review, on another website, concluded that the noise in the SX20 was significantly worse than the SX10 at ISO 400 and above. I've looked closely at the images here from both the SX10 and SX20 and I agree with the conclusion here that those from the two camera models are too close to choose among.

Any thoughts on the disparity? Would one expect a major difference from sample to sample of a single camera model?

[Jim Keenan]

Generally the manufacturers have a number of cameras that go out for review purposes -the Panasonic FX580 we recently reviewed came to us with a lot of wear on the painted surfaces indicating it had been on the review trail for a while before it reached us. The SX20 IS on the other hand looked fresh out of the box. While you wouldn't expect cameras of the same model to vary too much in performance, there's always the chance of one being a bit out of "good working order".

Camera settings could play a role, particularly cameras with the option to enable or disable a feature like Canon's i-contrast that seeks to expand the camera's perceived dynamic range. I don't think I've seen a camera with this type of feature from any manufacturer that didn't have a caveat somewhere in fine print that using the feature could result in "coarser" images (or similar language) depending on the scene being captured, so it's important to compare apples with apples.

[Kitrina]

Hi there. Thanks for the detailed review of the SX20 IS. Just wanted to get clarification on the battery/power supply: is alkaline a better choice over rechargable Li-ion batteries? Seems you'd have to replace them quite a bit, but it's been a while since I used a digital that used alkaline batteries. Thanks!

[Andy Stanton]

The review has this to say about batteries used by the SX20IS:

Canon rates battery life (CIPA standard) at 340 shots for alkalines and approximately 600 for NiMH, making the choice of power supply a simple decision.

The review did not mention Li-ion rechargeable batteries because they can't be used in the SX20IS. You can use AA alkalines, AA lithiums or AA rechargeable batteries (NiMH or hybrid batteries like Sanyo Eneloops).

[clehman]

This review is really great. I've decided I can't stand the cheap $100 camera I bought a couple of years ago any longer, and have spent the past few months trying to figure out which one I'm going to go with. Pretty sure my mind is made up now. Thank you!

[cabarini]

First of all... sory about my english... but I'll try to write my point of view.

I have an SX10 and use (a lot) an SX20.
I think the weight is because 4 AA size bateries. I prefer use regular AA size bateries that I found anywhere and have an weighter camera, than use and lighter camera but with an proprietary Li ion batery.

I don't use ISO 800 or more because the noise is unnaceptable. That's the worst of this cameras. The ISO quality on Nikon P100 are very better.

But the informations in display, the easy way to setup in (M)anual mode, default non proprietary USB connector (I can use any Mini USB cable) and the AA size bateries makes the SX10 or SX20 my superzoom camera choice.

I wish 'SX30'(?) just like the SX10 just with more photos per second and better ISO quality.

[philipandrew]

I've had this camera about 6 months now and am very pleased with it.

It takes excellent shots at all focal lengths, and the HD video really works well with excellent quality even in low-light situations. Indeed, this camera functions very well in all low light conditions, and even has a special ISO3200 option if you need it.

As reported in the review, the handling and feel of the camera are very solid and robust, with one exception (see below). I have to disagree with Andy (#2) about the weight. One of the fantastic things about this camera is the x20 optical zoom (with up to x80 digital enlargement). I find the weight of the body really helps to give me the steadiness I need to take pictures at that focal length. The camera's stabilization s/w and nicely balanced weight-distribution also mean I've had hardly any problems at taking really clear long-distance shots without any shake or blur. Of course, if you're looking for something light that will fit in your back pocket, this camera's shape (rather than weight) will rule it out.

A last point about the user manual - Canon provide a full, comprehensive electronic pdf manual with internal hyperlinks. It's actually the best user manual I've ever seen. What they don't do is provide you with a printed version of the same (as said above, the printed manual is basically a 'dummies' / 'quick ref' guide). However, if you're used to reading eBooks and docs on your phone, laptop, tablet, computer etc as I am, you won't have any problems. The full eManual is actually fantastic, and the hyperlinks in the pdf make it far more usable for me than a printed one (which I'd probably have lost or buried by now anyway).

A few minor niggles:

1. Lens cap. I lost it within about a month because it has no tether or storage place. I also found it never really fitted as securely as I'd have expected. Rather than paying the overinflated price for a replacement Canon one, I bought a cheaper, no-name centre-pinch type with a tether, and which fits on the 52mm lens far more securely than the original Canon one ever did.

2. Battery power. Definitely invest in rechargeable NiMhs when you buy the camera. The SX20 will eat through a set of Duracells in a single day's outing. The number of shots count given in the spec is misleading. It depends how much zooming, reviewing, flashing, videoing and other things you're doing with the camera. I find a typical afternoon out with the family exhausts four batteries no problem. I use rechargeables and carry a set of Duracells for backup in case of a really heavy shoot.

3. Battery compartment door. Heavy changing off the batteries means you have to be really careful with the spring-loaded battery compartment door. Although I've had no problems so far, my biggest worry about this camera is that the battery door is going to break. It's the only thing on the camera that I'd describe as 'flimsy', and is something Canon really need to look into improving. I'd hate to think how much that will cost to fix when it breaks (which I think is almost inevitable eventually given the amount of use it gets- probably the day after the 1-yr warranty expires...).

Overall, I'm very impressed with this camera's capabilities and versatility. It does everything I want a camera to do and still has some functions I've yet to explore. I've taken some fine pictures with it that have surprised me (I'm not much of an expert). Ultimately, it's made me think about moving into the Canon DSLR range in the future.

Personal Rating 4.5/5